Argument about Al Gore's Film

The move, “An Inconvenient Truth” of Al-gore has both positive and negative aspects. In this essay I will look at the reviews of “Inconvenient truth” film of Al-gore and I will discuss both sides of the argument.

Al Gore is trying to prove that, we are in a period of global warming, which is like trying to prove that grass is green with an abundance of evidence, or trying to kill a mosquito with an atomic bomb. Unfortunately, in addition, he is trying to get us to believe that man is responsible, and that in the United States have the ability to stop it if only we had the will, (Tony Medley) in Negative & Skeptical Reviews with rating 6/10.

Now there is no doubt we can solve this problem. In fact, we have a moral obligation to do so, (Gregg) in the film report. In “Climate Crisis” small changes to your daily routine can add up to big differences in helping to stop global warming. The time to come together to solve this problem is now.

In my opinion, I can’t agree more than what (Tony Medley) said and mentioned, because it may help people to move and look for a solution for the global warming issue. And about what (Gregg) said in his report because he didn’t like the film, it was so interesting that people couldn’t stop from watching it every day and scientists also learn from it.




Bibliography
· The Movie Reviews, Permalink (June 23, 2006)
· http://thinksmart.typepad.com/carbon_neutral_strategies/2006/06/negative_skepti.html
· Inconvenient Truth, (2006)
· http://www.climatecrisis.net/aboutthefilm/